Use the 2026 audit record to document responsibility for every financial-content claim rather than assuming that a byline, badge, or markup field proves expertise.
Checklist item: Verify advisor biography pages against internal records. Evidence required: approved role, current credentials, biography copy, publication links, and the firm's own personnel records.
Pass condition: the biography accurately reflects the advisor's current role and only lists credentials or experience the firm can substantiate. Fail condition: credentials are missing, stale, ambiguous, or unsupported.
Severity: Critical. Owner: marketing content owner with HR and compliance review as applicable. Corrective action: reconcile the biography with approved internal records and remove unsupported claims.
Validation step: compare the published page with the approved source record after deployment. Tools: Internal HR Records, LinkedIn.
Checklist item: Verify review attribution on high-stakes financial content. Evidence required: editorial workflow, reviewer identity, revision history, and approval record. Pass condition: any displayed reviewed-by or fact-checked attribution corresponds to a real documented review that occurred before publication or update.
Fail condition: a review label is decorative, unverifiable, or assigned to someone who did not perform the stated review. Severity: Critical. Owner: editorial lead and responsible reviewer. Corrective action: establish a documented review workflow or remove unsupported review labels. Validation step: sample published pages and trace each attribution to its approval record. Tools: CMS Custom Fields.
Checklist item: Audit claims and disclosures for the firm's applicable SEC and FINRA obligations and internal policies. Evidence required: current approved marketing guidance, page copy, metadata, disclosures, and sign-off records.
Pass condition: responsible reviewers have approved the claims and required disclosures for the firm's actual status, services, audience, and jurisdiction. Fail condition: performance language, guarantees, testimonials, endorsements, or other regulated claims are published without the required review.
Severity: Critical. Owner: the firm's designated compliance or legal reviewer. Corrective action: revise, qualify, disclose, or remove the claim based on responsible review. Validation step: record approval and re-check the live page against the approved version. Tools: Compliance Software, Legal Review.
Checklist item: Verify the About and editorial-policy pages explain the firm without overstating independence, compensation model, fiduciary status, or review practices. Evidence required: approved firm description, compensation disclosures where relevant, editorial process, and internal policy.
Pass condition: the public explanation is accurate, current, understandable, and consistent with other material pages. Fail condition: descriptions conflict across the site or imply a status the firm cannot substantiate.
Severity: High. Owner: marketing lead with responsible compliance review. Corrective action: reconcile terminology and document the approved description. Validation step: compare all major trust pages and service templates for consistency. Tools: Copywriting.
Checklist item: Evaluate external links and mentions as evidence, not endorsements assumed from domain reputation. Evidence required: referring-page URL, editorial context, link destination, publication relevance, and acquisition history.
Pass condition: the mention is legitimate, contextually relevant, and accurately represents the firm. Fail condition: the source is manipulative, unrelated, misleading, or obtained through a scheme that cannot withstand provenance review.
Severity: Medium. Owner: digital PR or SEO lead. Corrective action: prioritize legitimate editorial relationships and stop tactics built primarily around artificial placement volume. Validation step: review new referring domains and the exact surrounding context at regular reporting intervals. Tools: Ahrefs, Muck Rack.