Original research · 2026-07 edition

AI SEO Statistics: Alcohol Rehab Center (2026-07 edition)

15 questions · 45 AI responses · 3 models · measured 2026-07-04

The question bank

The questions we tested — sampled from real buyer journeys in alcohol rehab center.

Each model answered every question once, same wording, same day. These are the prompts behind every percentage on this page.

How do I know if my drinking has reached the point where I actually need a medical detox?
Is it safe to try and quit drinking cold turkey at home or should I go to a facility?
What is the average out-of-pocket cost for a 30-day inpatient alcohol program?
What are some red flags I should look for when reading reviews of local rehab centers?
Are there any alcohol treatment programs that allow you to keep your laptop for work?
What is the difference between a PHP and an intensive outpatient program for alcohol?
Does standard health insurance usually cover the full cost of residential treatment?
What specific certifications should a high-quality alcohol recovery center have?
Show all 15 questions
I need an alcohol rehab that specializes in dual diagnosis for depression, what should I look for?
Are there non-religious alcohol treatment options that don't use the 12-step model?
How do I find a rehab center that allows for family visits or family therapy sessions?
What are the success rates for outpatient vs inpatient alcohol treatment for long-term sobriety?
Can I be fired from my job if I take a leave of absence to go to an alcohol rehab center?
What happens during a typical day in a residential alcohol treatment facility?
Is there a way to verify if a rehab center is a 'rehab mill' before I pay a deposit?

Model by model

21-point average divergence: which AI you ask changes the answer.

The divergence index is the average gap between the most and least likely model per behavior. Higher = the models disagree more about alcohol rehab center buyers.

Behavior rates across 15 alcohol rehab center buyer questions, 2026-07 edition. Last column: average across models.
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiConsensus
Recommends hiring a professional73%53%27%40%
Suggests DIY first40%20%7%67%
Names specific providers13%20%7%87%
Gives price or cost info7%13%13%73%
Tells to check reviews20%13%0%80%
Tells to verify credentials33%27%27%87%
Mentions case studies / portfolio7%0%0%93%
Mentions local proximity53%40%7%40%
Gives selection criteria60%53%33%60%
Warns about red flags13%20%20%87%
Asks a clarifying question73%67%0%13%
Recommends multiple quotes7%0%0%93%

By model

How each assistant handled Alcohol Rehab Center questions.

Reading the 45 answers model by model shows how differently the three assistants treat the same alcohol rehab center questions. On the most consequential behavior — whether to send the buyer to a professional at all — the rate ranged from 73.3% (ChatGPT) down to 26.7% (Gemini), a 47-point gap on an identical question set.

Across the 15 alcohol rehab center answers it produced, ChatGPT recommended hiring a professional in 73.3% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 40% of the time. It named a specific provider in 13.3% of answers (about 0.5 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 6.7% of the time. ChatGPT asked a clarifying question before answering in 73.3% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 13.3%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 33.3%, averaging 546 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 20%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 6.7%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 53.3%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 60% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 6.7%.

Across the 15 alcohol rehab center answers it produced, Claude recommended hiring a professional in 53.3% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 20% of the time. It named a specific provider in 20% of answers (about 0.4 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 13.3% of the time. Claude asked a clarifying question before answering in 66.7% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 20%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 26.7%, averaging 284 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 13.3%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 0%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 40%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 53.3% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 0%.

Across the 15 alcohol rehab center answers it produced, Gemini recommended hiring a professional in 26.7% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 6.7% of the time. It named a specific provider in 6.7% of answers (about 0.2 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 13.3% of the time. Gemini asked a clarifying question before answering in 0% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 20%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 26.7%, averaging 252 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 0%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 0%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 6.7%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 33.3% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 0%.

Taken together, ChatGPT is the assistant most likely to route an alcohol rehab center buyer to a professional (73.3%) and Gemini the least (26.7%). ChatGPT produced the longest answers, at 546 words on average. Specific providers were named most often by Claude (20%) — even there, roughly one answer in 5 carried a name.

Where they disagree

The behaviors where the choice of model changes the answer.

The divergence index for this study is 21.1 points — the average distance between the most and least likely model across the coded behaviors. The gaps below are where which assistant an alcohol rehab center buyer happens to ask matters most:

  • Asks a clarifying question: from 0% (Gemini) to 73.3% (ChatGPT) — a 73-point spread.
  • Recommends hiring a professional: from 26.7% (Gemini) to 73.3% (ChatGPT) — a 47-point spread.
  • Mentions local proximity: from 6.7% (Gemini) to 53.3% (ChatGPT) — a 47-point spread.
  • Suggests a DIY approach first: from 6.7% (Gemini) to 40% (ChatGPT) — a 33-point spread.
  • Gives selection criteria: from 33.3% (Gemini) to 60% (ChatGPT) — a 27-point spread.

The widest single gap — asks a clarifying question, 73 points — means an alcohol rehab center buyer can receive materially different guidance on the same question depending only on which assistant they happen to open, so any visibility strategy built on a single model's behavior describes only part of the alcohol rehab center market.

Where they agree

The points of near-consensus in Alcohol Rehab Center.

On other behaviors the three models move almost in lockstep — the points of near-consensus for alcohol rehab center, where all three landed within a few points of each other:

  • Gives price or cost information: 6.7%–13.3% across all three (a 7-point spread).
  • Tells the buyer to verify credentials: 26.7%–33.3% across all three (a 7-point spread).
  • Mentions case studies or portfolio: 0%–6.7% across all three (a 7-point spread).
  • Warns about red flags or scams: 13.3%–20% across all three (a 7-point spread).

Measured question by question, the three assistants coded a response the same way most consistently on "mentions case studies or portfolio" (identical coding in 93.3% of questions) and least consistently on "asks a clarifying question" (13.3%).

Every behavior, measured

All twelve coded behaviors for Alcohol Rehab Center, averaged across the three models.

The behaviors AI models reproduce most often for alcohol rehab center are recommends hiring a professional (51.1% on average), gives selection criteria (48.9%) and asks a clarifying question (46.7%); the rarest are recommends multiple quotes (2.2%), mentions case studies or portfolio (2.2%) and tells the buyer to check reviews (11.1%). Each figure below is the share of a model's 15 answers in which the behavior appeared at least once, averaged across the 3 models with the full per-model range in parentheses:

  • Recommends hiring a professional: 51.1% on average (ChatGPT 73.3%, Claude 53.3%, Gemini 26.7%) — a 47-point spread.
  • Gives selection criteria: 48.9% on average (ChatGPT 60%, Claude 53.3%, Gemini 33.3%) — a 27-point spread.
  • Asks a clarifying question: 46.7% on average (ChatGPT 73.3%, Claude 66.7%, Gemini 0%) — a 73-point spread.
  • Mentions local proximity: 33.3% on average (ChatGPT 53.3%, Claude 40%, Gemini 6.7%) — a 47-point spread.
  • Tells the buyer to verify credentials: 28.9% on average (ChatGPT 33.3%, Claude 26.7%, Gemini 26.7%) — a 7-point spread.
  • Suggests a DIY approach first: 22.2% on average (ChatGPT 40%, Claude 20%, Gemini 6.7%) — a 33-point spread.
  • Warns about red flags or scams: 17.8% on average (ChatGPT 13.3%, Claude 20%, Gemini 20%) — a 7-point spread.
  • Names a specific provider: 13.3% on average (ChatGPT 13.3%, Claude 20%, Gemini 6.7%) — a 13-point spread.
  • Gives price or cost information: 11.1% on average (ChatGPT 6.7%, Claude 13.3%, Gemini 13.3%) — a 7-point spread.
  • Tells the buyer to check reviews: 11.1% on average (ChatGPT 20%, Claude 13.3%, Gemini 0%) — a 20-point spread.
  • Mentions case studies or portfolio: 2.2% on average (ChatGPT 6.7%, Claude 0%, Gemini 0%) — a 7-point spread.
  • Recommends multiple quotes: 2.2% on average (ChatGPT 6.7%, Claude 0%, Gemini 0%) — a 7-point spread.

Trust signals

How well the models protect the alcohol rehab center buyer.

Beyond whether to hire, the rubric codes how carefully each assistant protects the alcohol rehab center buyer once a decision is made. Telling the buyer to check reviews or ratings appeared in 11.1% of answers on average. Verifying credentials or certifications appeared in 28.9%. Warning about red flags or scams appeared in 17.8%.

On structuring the decision, a selection-criteria checklist showed up in 48.9% of answers on average and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 2.2%. The single least-reproduced protective signal for alcohol rehab center is "recommends multiple quotes" at 2.2% on average — the clearest opening for content that supplies it, since the models are not yet reliably surfacing that guidance on their own.

Referral behavior

Do AI models name Alcohol Rehab Center providers?

For service providers the decisive question is whether these systems name anyone at all. Across 45 alcohol rehab center answers, a specific provider was named in 13.3% of responses on average — roughly 0.4 distinct providers per answer. In practice the assistants behave far more as an explanatory layer than as a referral engine for alcohol rehab center: visibility comes from being the reasoning a model reproduces, not from being the named recommendation.

The question set

What these 15 Alcohol Rehab Center questions cover.

The 15 questions behind every percentage on this page were drawn from real alcohol rehab center (healthcare services; buyer hiring decisions for this specific service) buyer journeys. Each was put to all 3 models once, with identical wording, so the rates above describe how the assistants handled this exact alcohol rehab center question set — not a general prior or a hand-picked subset. The full list is shown earlier on this page; the coded percentages are what those specific questions produced.

How to read this

A note on the numbers.

A percentage here is the share of a model's 15 answers in which the behavior appeared at least once — not a confidence score. Because each model answered every question exactly once on 2026-07-04, the figures describe this specific alcohol rehab center question set and snapshot rather than a general prior. The full protocol and coding rubric are documented in the study methodology.

Methodology

A controlled snapshot, documented end to end.

15 standardized buyer questions per industry, one response per model per question (ChatGPT (gpt-5-mini), Claude (claude-sonnet-5), Gemini (gemini-3-flash-preview)), collected 2026-07-04, coded against a fixed 12-behavior rubric with human QA. AI outputs vary with model version, location and time — figures describe this sample and window, and are refreshed each edition. Read the full methodology →