AI SEO Statistics: Best SEO for Functional Medicine (2026-07 edition)

Reading the 120 answers model by model shows how differently the three assistants treat the same best seo for functional medicine questions. On the most consequential behavior — whether to send the buyer to a professional at all — the rate ranged from 22.5% (ChatGPT) down to 20% (Claude), a 3-point gap on an identical question set.

Across the 40 best seo for functional medicine answers it produced, ChatGPT recommended hiring a professional in 22.5% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 47.5% of the time. It named a specific provider in 0% of answers (about 0 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 5% of the time. ChatGPT asked a clarifying question before answering in 30% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 12.5%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 5%, averaging 756 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 0%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 12.5%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 30%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 12.5% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 5%.

Across the 40 best seo for functional medicine answers it produced, Claude recommended hiring a professional in 20% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 25% of the time. It named a specific provider in 5% of answers (about 0.2 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 2.5% of the time. Claude asked a clarifying question before answering in 40% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 7.5%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 0%, averaging 335 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 2.5%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 5%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 37.5%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 10% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 0%.

Across the 40 best seo for functional medicine answers it produced, Gemini recommended hiring a professional in 20% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 25% of the time. It named a specific provider in 7.5% of answers (about 0.1 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 2.5% of the time. Gemini asked a clarifying question before answering in 0% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 10%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 5%, averaging 231 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 0%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 5%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 42.5%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 15% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 0%.

Taken together, ChatGPT is the assistant most likely to route a best seo for functional medicine buyer to a professional (22.5%) and Claude the least (20%). ChatGPT produced the longest answers, at 756 words on average. Specific providers were named most often by Gemini (7.5%) — even there, roughly one answer in 13 carried a name.

On other behaviors the three models move almost in lockstep — the points of near-consensus for best seo for functional medicine, where all three landed within a few points of each other:

• Recommends hiring a professional: 20%–22.5% across all three (a 3-point spread).
• Gives price or cost information: 2.5%–5% across all three (a 3-point spread).
• Tells the buyer to check reviews: 0%–2.5% across all three (a 3-point spread).
• Tells the buyer to verify credentials: 0%–5% across all three (a 5-point spread).

Measured question by question, the three assistants coded a response the same way most consistently on "tells the buyer to check reviews" (identical coding in 97.5% of questions) and least consistently on "mentions local proximity" (45%).

Beyond whether to hire, the rubric codes how carefully each assistant protects the best seo for functional medicine buyer once a decision is made. Telling the buyer to check reviews or ratings appeared in 0.8% of answers on average. Verifying credentials or certifications appeared in 3.3%. Warning about red flags or scams appeared in 10%.

On structuring the decision, a selection-criteria checklist showed up in 12.5% of answers on average and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 1.7%. The single least-reproduced protective signal for best seo for functional medicine is "tells the buyer to check reviews" at 0.8% on average — the clearest opening for content that supplies it, since the models are not yet reliably surfacing that guidance on their own.

The 40 questions behind every percentage on this page were drawn from real best seo for functional medicine (healthcare services; buyer hiring decisions for this specific service) buyer journeys. Each was put to all 3 models once, with identical wording, so the rates above describe how the assistants handled this exact best seo for functional medicine question set — not a general prior or a hand-picked subset. The full list is shown earlier on this page; the coded percentages are what those specific questions produced.