AI SEO Statistics: Hair Transplant Clinics (2026-07 edition)
36 questions · 108 AI responses · 3 models · measured 2026-07-06
The question bank
The questions we tested — sampled from real buyer journeys in hair transplant clinics.
Each model answered every question once, same wording, same day. These are the prompts behind every percentage on this page.
Show all 36 questions
Model by model
21-point average divergence: which AI you ask changes the answer.
The divergence index is the average gap between the most and least likely model per behavior. Higher = the models disagree more about hair transplant clinics buyers.
| ChatGPT | Claude | Gemini | Consensus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommends hiring a professional | 69% | 56% | 19% | 44% |
| Suggests DIY first | 6% | 0% | 6% | 89% |
| Names specific providers | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Gives price or cost info | 8% | 6% | 8% | 94% |
| Tells to check reviews | 22% | 14% | 3% | 78% |
| Tells to verify credentials | 33% | 36% | 8% | 64% |
| Mentions case studies / portfolio | 44% | 17% | 6% | 56% |
| Mentions local proximity | 14% | 11% | 11% | 89% |
| Gives selection criteria | 53% | 36% | 25% | 58% |
| Warns about red flags | 25% | 33% | 17% | 69% |
| Asks a clarifying question | 64% | 72% | 3% | 8% |
| Recommends multiple quotes | 17% | 19% | 6% | 78% |
By model
How each assistant handled Hair Transplant Clinics questions.
Reading the 108 answers model by model shows how differently the three assistants treat the same hair transplant clinics questions. On the most consequential behavior — whether to send the buyer to a professional at all — the rate ranged from 69.4% (ChatGPT) down to 19.4% (Gemini), a 50-point gap on an identical question set.
Across the 36 hair transplant clinics answers it produced, ChatGPT recommended hiring a professional in 69.4% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 5.6% of the time. It named a specific provider in 0% of answers (about 0 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 8.3% of the time. ChatGPT asked a clarifying question before answering in 63.9% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 25%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 33.3%, averaging 500 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 22.2%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 44.4%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 13.9%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 52.8% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 16.7%.
Across the 36 hair transplant clinics answers it produced, Claude recommended hiring a professional in 55.6% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 0% of the time. It named a specific provider in 0% of answers (about 0 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 5.6% of the time. Claude asked a clarifying question before answering in 72.2% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 33.3%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 36.1%, averaging 286 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 13.9%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 16.7%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 11.1%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 36.1% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 19.4%.
Across the 36 hair transplant clinics answers it produced, Gemini recommended hiring a professional in 19.4% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 5.6% of the time. It named a specific provider in 0% of answers (about 0 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 8.3% of the time. Gemini asked a clarifying question before answering in 2.8% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 16.7%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 8.3%, averaging 258 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 2.8%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 5.6%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 11.1%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 25% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 5.6%.
Taken together, ChatGPT is the assistant most likely to route a hair transplant clinics buyer to a professional (69.4%) and Gemini the least (19.4%). ChatGPT produced the longest answers, at 500 words on average. No model named a specific provider in more than 0% of answers.
Where they disagree
The behaviors where the choice of model changes the answer.
The divergence index for this study is 20.7 points — the average distance between the most and least likely model across the coded behaviors. The gaps below are where which assistant a hair transplant clinics buyer happens to ask matters most:
- Asks a clarifying question: from 2.8% (Gemini) to 72.2% (Claude) — a 69-point spread.
- Recommends hiring a professional: from 19.4% (Gemini) to 69.4% (ChatGPT) — a 50-point spread.
- Mentions case studies or portfolio: from 5.6% (Gemini) to 44.4% (ChatGPT) — a 39-point spread.
- Tells the buyer to verify credentials: from 8.3% (Gemini) to 36.1% (Claude) — a 28-point spread.
- Gives selection criteria: from 25% (Gemini) to 52.8% (ChatGPT) — a 28-point spread.
The widest single gap — asks a clarifying question, 69 points — means a hair transplant clinics buyer can receive materially different guidance on the same question depending only on which assistant they happen to open, so any visibility strategy built on a single model's behavior describes only part of the hair transplant clinics market.
Where they agree
The points of near-consensus in Hair Transplant Clinics.
On other behaviors the three models move almost in lockstep — the points of near-consensus for hair transplant clinics, where all three landed within a few points of each other:
- Names a specific provider: 0% across all three models.
- Gives price or cost information: 5.6%–8.3% across all three (a 3-point spread).
- Mentions local proximity: 11.1%–13.9% across all three (a 3-point spread).
- Suggests a DIY approach first: 0%–5.6% across all three (a 6-point spread).
Measured question by question, the three assistants coded a response the same way most consistently on "names a specific provider" (identical coding in 100% of questions) and least consistently on "asks a clarifying question" (8.3%).
Every behavior, measured
All twelve coded behaviors for Hair Transplant Clinics, averaged across the three models.
The behaviors AI models reproduce most often for hair transplant clinics are recommends hiring a professional (48.1% on average), asks a clarifying question (46.3%) and gives selection criteria (38%); the rarest are names a specific provider (0%), suggests a DIY approach first (3.7%) and gives price or cost information (7.4%). Each figure below is the share of a model's 36 answers in which the behavior appeared at least once, averaged across the 3 models with the full per-model range in parentheses:
- Recommends hiring a professional: 48.1% on average (ChatGPT 69.4%, Claude 55.6%, Gemini 19.4%) — a 50-point spread.
- Asks a clarifying question: 46.3% on average (ChatGPT 63.9%, Claude 72.2%, Gemini 2.8%) — a 69-point spread.
- Gives selection criteria: 38% on average (ChatGPT 52.8%, Claude 36.1%, Gemini 25%) — a 28-point spread.
- Tells the buyer to verify credentials: 25.9% on average (ChatGPT 33.3%, Claude 36.1%, Gemini 8.3%) — a 28-point spread.
- Warns about red flags or scams: 25% on average (ChatGPT 25%, Claude 33.3%, Gemini 16.7%) — a 17-point spread.
- Mentions case studies or portfolio: 22.2% on average (ChatGPT 44.4%, Claude 16.7%, Gemini 5.6%) — a 39-point spread.
- Recommends multiple quotes: 13.9% on average (ChatGPT 16.7%, Claude 19.4%, Gemini 5.6%) — a 14-point spread.
- Tells the buyer to check reviews: 13% on average (ChatGPT 22.2%, Claude 13.9%, Gemini 2.8%) — a 19-point spread.
- Mentions local proximity: 12% on average (ChatGPT 13.9%, Claude 11.1%, Gemini 11.1%) — a 3-point spread.
- Gives price or cost information: 7.4% on average (ChatGPT 8.3%, Claude 5.6%, Gemini 8.3%) — a 3-point spread.
- Suggests a DIY approach first: 3.7% on average (ChatGPT 5.6%, Claude 0%, Gemini 5.6%) — a 6-point spread.
- Names a specific provider: 0% on average (ChatGPT 0%, Claude 0%, Gemini 0%).
Trust signals
How well the models protect the hair transplant clinics buyer.
Beyond whether to hire, the rubric codes how carefully each assistant protects the hair transplant clinics buyer once a decision is made. Telling the buyer to check reviews or ratings appeared in 13% of answers on average. Verifying credentials or certifications appeared in 25.9%. Warning about red flags or scams appeared in 25%.
On structuring the decision, a selection-criteria checklist showed up in 38% of answers on average and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 13.9%. The single least-reproduced protective signal for hair transplant clinics is "tells the buyer to check reviews" at 13% on average — the clearest opening for content that supplies it, since the models are not yet reliably surfacing that guidance on their own.
Referral behavior
Do AI models name Hair Transplant Clinics providers?
For service providers the decisive question is whether these systems name anyone at all. Across 108 hair transplant clinics answers, a specific provider was named in 0% of responses on average — roughly 0 distinct providers per answer. In practice the assistants behave far more as an explanatory layer than as a referral engine for hair transplant clinics: visibility comes from being the reasoning a model reproduces, not from being the named recommendation.
The question set
What these 36 Hair Transplant Clinics questions cover.
The 36 questions behind every percentage on this page were drawn from real hair transplant clinics (healthcare services; buyer hiring decisions for this specific service) buyer journeys. Each was put to all 3 models once, with identical wording, so the rates above describe how the assistants handled this exact hair transplant clinics question set — not a general prior or a hand-picked subset. The full list is shown earlier on this page; the coded percentages are what those specific questions produced.
How to read this
A note on the numbers.
A percentage here is the share of a model's 36 answers in which the behavior appeared at least once — not a confidence score. Because each model answered every question exactly once on 2026-07-06, the figures describe this specific hair transplant clinics question set and snapshot rather than a general prior. The full protocol and coding rubric are documented in the study methodology.
Methodology
A controlled snapshot, documented end to end.
36 standardized buyer questions per industry, one response per model per question (ChatGPT (gpt-5-mini), Claude (claude-sonnet-5), Gemini (gemini-3-flash-preview)), collected 2026-07-06, coded against a fixed 12-behavior rubric with human QA. AI outputs vary with model version, location and time — figures describe this sample and window, and are refreshed each edition. Read the full methodology →