AI SEO Statistics: Medical Weight Loss Companies (2026-07 edition)
37 questions · 111 AI responses · 3 models · measured 2026-07-06
The question bank
The questions we tested — sampled from real buyer journeys in medical weight loss companies.
Each model answered every question once, same wording, same day. These are the prompts behind every percentage on this page.
Show all 37 questions
Model by model
19-point average divergence: which AI you ask changes the answer.
The divergence index is the average gap between the most and least likely model per behavior. Higher = the models disagree more about medical weight loss companies buyers.
| ChatGPT | Claude | Gemini | Consensus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommends hiring a professional | 70% | 57% | 35% | 43% |
| Suggests DIY first | 5% | 5% | 8% | 92% |
| Names specific providers | 3% | 14% | 22% | 73% |
| Gives price or cost info | 3% | 3% | 11% | 89% |
| Tells to check reviews | 8% | 8% | 3% | 87% |
| Tells to verify credentials | 30% | 24% | 8% | 70% |
| Mentions case studies / portfolio | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Mentions local proximity | 14% | 11% | 8% | 81% |
| Gives selection criteria | 41% | 41% | 22% | 46% |
| Warns about red flags | 22% | 30% | 8% | 65% |
| Asks a clarifying question | 60% | 73% | 0% | 14% |
| Recommends multiple quotes | 3% | 0% | 0% | 97% |
By model
How each assistant handled Medical Weight Loss Companies questions.
Reading the 111 answers model by model shows how differently the three assistants treat the same medical weight loss companies questions. On the most consequential behavior — whether to send the buyer to a professional at all — the rate ranged from 70.3% (ChatGPT) down to 35.1% (Gemini), a 35-point gap on an identical question set.
Across the 37 medical weight loss companies answers it produced, ChatGPT recommended hiring a professional in 70.3% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 5.4% of the time. It named a specific provider in 2.7% of answers (about 0 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 2.7% of the time. ChatGPT asked a clarifying question before answering in 59.5% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 21.6%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 29.7%, averaging 502 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 8.1%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 0%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 13.5%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 40.5% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 2.7%.
Across the 37 medical weight loss companies answers it produced, Claude recommended hiring a professional in 56.8% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 5.4% of the time. It named a specific provider in 13.5% of answers (about 0.2 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 2.7% of the time. Claude asked a clarifying question before answering in 73% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 29.7%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 24.3%, averaging 282 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 8.1%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 0%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 10.8%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 40.5% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 0%.
Across the 37 medical weight loss companies answers it produced, Gemini recommended hiring a professional in 35.1% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 8.1% of the time. It named a specific provider in 21.6% of answers (about 0.7 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 10.8% of the time. Gemini asked a clarifying question before answering in 0% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 8.1%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 8.1%, averaging 251 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 2.7%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 0%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 8.1%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 21.6% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 0%.
Taken together, ChatGPT is the assistant most likely to route a medical weight loss companies buyer to a professional (70.3%) and Gemini the least (35.1%). ChatGPT produced the longest answers, at 502 words on average. Specific providers were named most often by Gemini (21.6%) — even there, roughly one answer in 5 carried a name.
Where they disagree
The behaviors where the choice of model changes the answer.
The divergence index for this study is 19.1 points — the average distance between the most and least likely model across the coded behaviors. The gaps below are where which assistant a medical weight loss companies buyer happens to ask matters most:
- Asks a clarifying question: from 0% (Gemini) to 73% (Claude) — a 73-point spread.
- Recommends hiring a professional: from 35.1% (Gemini) to 70.3% (ChatGPT) — a 35-point spread.
- Tells the buyer to verify credentials: from 8.1% (Gemini) to 29.7% (ChatGPT) — a 22-point spread.
- Warns about red flags or scams: from 8.1% (Gemini) to 29.7% (Claude) — a 22-point spread.
- Names a specific provider: from 2.7% (ChatGPT) to 21.6% (Gemini) — a 19-point spread.
The widest single gap — asks a clarifying question, 73 points — means a medical weight loss companies buyer can receive materially different guidance on the same question depending only on which assistant they happen to open, so any visibility strategy built on a single model's behavior describes only part of the medical weight loss companies market.
Where they agree
The points of near-consensus in Medical Weight Loss Companies.
On other behaviors the three models move almost in lockstep — the points of near-consensus for medical weight loss companies, where all three landed within a few points of each other:
- Mentions case studies or portfolio: 0% across all three models.
- Suggests a DIY approach first: 5.4%–8.1% across all three (a 3-point spread).
- Recommends multiple quotes: 0%–2.7% across all three (a 3-point spread).
- Tells the buyer to check reviews: 2.7%–8.1% across all three (a 5-point spread).
Measured question by question, the three assistants coded a response the same way most consistently on "mentions case studies or portfolio" (identical coding in 100% of questions) and least consistently on "asks a clarifying question" (13.5%).
Every behavior, measured
All twelve coded behaviors for Medical Weight Loss Companies, averaged across the three models.
The behaviors AI models reproduce most often for medical weight loss companies are recommends hiring a professional (54.1% on average), asks a clarifying question (44.2%) and gives selection criteria (34.2%); the rarest are mentions case studies or portfolio (0%), recommends multiple quotes (0.9%) and gives price or cost information (5.4%). Each figure below is the share of a model's 37 answers in which the behavior appeared at least once, averaged across the 3 models with the full per-model range in parentheses:
- Recommends hiring a professional: 54.1% on average (ChatGPT 70.3%, Claude 56.8%, Gemini 35.1%) — a 35-point spread.
- Asks a clarifying question: 44.2% on average (ChatGPT 59.5%, Claude 73%, Gemini 0%) — a 73-point spread.
- Gives selection criteria: 34.2% on average (ChatGPT 40.5%, Claude 40.5%, Gemini 21.6%) — a 19-point spread.
- Tells the buyer to verify credentials: 20.7% on average (ChatGPT 29.7%, Claude 24.3%, Gemini 8.1%) — a 22-point spread.
- Warns about red flags or scams: 19.8% on average (ChatGPT 21.6%, Claude 29.7%, Gemini 8.1%) — a 22-point spread.
- Names a specific provider: 12.6% on average (ChatGPT 2.7%, Claude 13.5%, Gemini 21.6%) — a 19-point spread.
- Mentions local proximity: 10.8% on average (ChatGPT 13.5%, Claude 10.8%, Gemini 8.1%) — a 5-point spread.
- Suggests a DIY approach first: 6.3% on average (ChatGPT 5.4%, Claude 5.4%, Gemini 8.1%) — a 3-point spread.
- Tells the buyer to check reviews: 6.3% on average (ChatGPT 8.1%, Claude 8.1%, Gemini 2.7%) — a 5-point spread.
- Gives price or cost information: 5.4% on average (ChatGPT 2.7%, Claude 2.7%, Gemini 10.8%) — a 8-point spread.
- Recommends multiple quotes: 0.9% on average (ChatGPT 2.7%, Claude 0%, Gemini 0%) — a 3-point spread.
- Mentions case studies or portfolio: 0% on average (ChatGPT 0%, Claude 0%, Gemini 0%).
Trust signals
How well the models protect the medical weight loss companies buyer.
Beyond whether to hire, the rubric codes how carefully each assistant protects the medical weight loss companies buyer once a decision is made. Telling the buyer to check reviews or ratings appeared in 6.3% of answers on average. Verifying credentials or certifications appeared in 20.7%. Warning about red flags or scams appeared in 19.8%.
On structuring the decision, a selection-criteria checklist showed up in 34.2% of answers on average and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 0.9%. The single least-reproduced protective signal for medical weight loss companies is "recommends multiple quotes" at 0.9% on average — the clearest opening for content that supplies it, since the models are not yet reliably surfacing that guidance on their own.
Referral behavior
Do AI models name Medical Weight Loss Companies providers?
For service providers the decisive question is whether these systems name anyone at all. Across 111 medical weight loss companies answers, a specific provider was named in 12.6% of responses on average — roughly 0.3 distinct providers per answer. In practice the assistants behave far more as an explanatory layer than as a referral engine for medical weight loss companies: visibility comes from being the reasoning a model reproduces, not from being the named recommendation.
The question set
What these 37 Medical Weight Loss Companies questions cover.
The 37 questions behind every percentage on this page were drawn from real medical weight loss companies (healthcare services; buyer hiring decisions for this specific service) buyer journeys. Each was put to all 3 models once, with identical wording, so the rates above describe how the assistants handled this exact medical weight loss companies question set — not a general prior or a hand-picked subset. The full list is shown earlier on this page; the coded percentages are what those specific questions produced.
How to read this
A note on the numbers.
A percentage here is the share of a model's 37 answers in which the behavior appeared at least once — not a confidence score. Because each model answered every question exactly once on 2026-07-06, the figures describe this specific medical weight loss companies question set and snapshot rather than a general prior. The full protocol and coding rubric are documented in the study methodology.
Methodology
A controlled snapshot, documented end to end.
37 standardized buyer questions per industry, one response per model per question (ChatGPT (gpt-5-mini), Claude (claude-sonnet-5), Gemini (gemini-3-flash-preview)), collected 2026-07-06, coded against a fixed 12-behavior rubric with human QA. AI outputs vary with model version, location and time — figures describe this sample and window, and are refreshed each edition. Read the full methodology →