AI SEO Statistics: SEO Expert for Medical Aesthetic Clinics (2026-07 edition)

Reading the 120 answers model by model shows how differently the three assistants treat the same seo expert for medical aesthetic clinics questions. On the most consequential behavior — whether to send the buyer to a professional at all — the rate ranged from 50% (ChatGPT) down to 32.5% (Gemini), a 18-point gap on an identical question set.

Across the 40 seo expert for medical aesthetic clinics answers it produced, ChatGPT recommended hiring a professional in 50% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 45% of the time. It named a specific provider in 0% of answers (about 0 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 12.5% of the time. ChatGPT asked a clarifying question before answering in 22.5% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 5%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 0%, averaging 684 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 0%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 5%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 20%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 7.5% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 0%.

Across the 40 seo expert for medical aesthetic clinics answers it produced, Claude recommended hiring a professional in 35% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 27.5% of the time. It named a specific provider in 10% of answers (about 0.1 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 12.5% of the time. Claude asked a clarifying question before answering in 50% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 22.5%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 7.5%, averaging 332 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 12.5%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 20%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 47.5%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 30% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 2.5%.

Across the 40 seo expert for medical aesthetic clinics answers it produced, Gemini recommended hiring a professional in 32.5% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 12.5% of the time. It named a specific provider in 5% of answers (about 0.2 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 7.5% of the time. Gemini asked a clarifying question before answering in 0% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 17.5%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 0%, averaging 238 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 2.5%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 5%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 50%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 17.5% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 0%.

Taken together, ChatGPT is the assistant most likely to route a seo expert for medical aesthetic clinics buyer to a professional (50%) and Gemini the least (32.5%). ChatGPT produced the longest answers, at 684 words on average. Specific providers were named most often by Claude (10%) — even there, roughly one answer in 10 carried a name.

On other behaviors the three models move almost in lockstep — the points of near-consensus for seo expert for medical aesthetic clinics, where all three landed within a few points of each other:

• Recommends multiple quotes: 0%–2.5% across all three (a 3-point spread).
• Gives price or cost information: 7.5%–12.5% across all three (a 5-point spread).
• Tells the buyer to verify credentials: 0%–7.5% across all three (a 8-point spread).
• Names a specific provider: 0%–10% across all three (a 10-point spread).

Measured question by question, the three assistants coded a response the same way most consistently on "recommends multiple quotes" (identical coding in 97.5% of questions) and least consistently on "mentions local proximity" (37.5%).

Beyond whether to hire, the rubric codes how carefully each assistant protects the seo expert for medical aesthetic clinics buyer once a decision is made. Telling the buyer to check reviews or ratings appeared in 5% of answers on average. Verifying credentials or certifications appeared in 2.5%. Warning about red flags or scams appeared in 15%.

On structuring the decision, a selection-criteria checklist showed up in 18.3% of answers on average and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 0.8%. The single least-reproduced protective signal for seo expert for medical aesthetic clinics is "recommends multiple quotes" at 0.8% on average — the clearest opening for content that supplies it, since the models are not yet reliably surfacing that guidance on their own.

The 40 questions behind every percentage on this page form a frozen seo expert for medical aesthetic clinics (healthcare services; buyer hiring decisions for this specific service) buyer-intent benchmark. Each was put to all 3 models once, with identical wording, so the rates above describe how the assistants handled this exact seo expert for medical aesthetic clinics question set — not a general prior or a hand-picked subset. The full list is shown earlier on this page; the coded percentages are what those specific questions produced.