AI SEO Statistics: Fencing Company (2026-07 edition)

Reading the 45 answers model by model shows how differently the three assistants treat the same fencing company questions. On the most consequential behavior — whether to send the buyer to a professional at all — the rate ranged from 60% (ChatGPT) down to 40% (Gemini), a 20-point gap on an identical question set.

Across the 15 fencing company answers it produced, ChatGPT recommended hiring a professional in 60% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 20% of the time. It named a specific provider in 0% of answers (about 0 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 13.3% of the time. ChatGPT asked a clarifying question before answering in 73.3% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 6.7%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 6.7%, averaging 524 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 6.7%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 13.3%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 26.7%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 33.3% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 26.7%.

Across the 15 fencing company answers it produced, Claude recommended hiring a professional in 53.3% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 20% of the time. It named a specific provider in 0% of answers (about 0 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 40% of the time. Claude asked a clarifying question before answering in 53.3% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 6.7%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 13.3%, averaging 302 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 20%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 6.7%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 33.3%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 26.7% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 26.7%.

Across the 15 fencing company answers it produced, Gemini recommended hiring a professional in 40% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 20% of the time. It named a specific provider in 6.7% of answers (about 0.1 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 53.3% of the time. Gemini asked a clarifying question before answering in 0% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 6.7%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 6.7%, averaging 268 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 0%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 0%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 6.7%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 20% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 6.7%.

Taken together, ChatGPT is the assistant most likely to route a fencing company buyer to a professional (60%) and Gemini the least (40%). ChatGPT produced the longest answers, at 524 words on average. Specific providers were named most often by Gemini (6.7%) — even there, roughly one answer in 15 carried a name.

On other behaviors the three models move almost in lockstep — the points of near-consensus for fencing company, where all three landed within a few points of each other:

• Suggests a DIY approach first: 20% across all three models.
• Warns about red flags or scams: 6.7% across all three models.
• Tells the buyer to verify credentials: 6.7%–13.3% across all three (a 7-point spread).
• Names a specific provider: 0%–6.7% across all three (a 7-point spread).

Measured question by question, the three assistants coded a response the same way most consistently on "warns about red flags or scams" (identical coding in 100% of questions) and least consistently on "asks a clarifying question" (13.3%).

Beyond whether to hire, the rubric codes how carefully each assistant protects the fencing company buyer once a decision is made. Telling the buyer to check reviews or ratings appeared in 8.9% of answers on average. Verifying credentials or certifications appeared in 8.9%. Warning about red flags or scams appeared in 6.7%.

On structuring the decision, a selection-criteria checklist showed up in 26.7% of answers on average and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 20%. The single least-reproduced protective signal for fencing company is "warns about red flags or scams" at 6.7% on average — the clearest opening for content that supplies it, since the models are not yet reliably surfacing that guidance on their own.

The 15 questions behind every percentage on this page were drawn from real fencing company (home services; buyer hiring decisions for this specific service) buyer journeys. Each was put to all 3 models once, with identical wording, so the rates above describe how the assistants handled this exact fencing company question set — not a general prior or a hand-picked subset. The full list is shown earlier on this page; the coded percentages are what those specific questions produced.