Original research · 2026-07 edition

AI SEO Statistics: Garage Door Company (2026-07 edition)

15 questions · 45 AI responses · 3 models · measured 2026-07-04

The question bank

The questions we tested — sampled from real buyer journeys in garage door company.

Each model answered every question once, same wording, same day. These are the prompts behind every percentage on this page.

My garage door is making a high-pitched screeching sound when it opens, what could be wrong?
My garage door spring just snapped and my car is trapped inside, how fast can someone get here?
Is it safe to try and replace a garage door tension spring myself or should I call a professional?
How much does a basic double-car aluminum garage door cost including installation?
What kind of warranty should I expect from a reputable garage door repair company?
Should I get a belt drive or a chain drive opener if my bedroom is right above the garage?
Are there any garage door companies near me that offer 24/7 emergency service without a huge dispatch fee?
What are some warning signs that a garage door technician is trying to overcharge me for unnecessary parts?
Show all 15 questions
I have a $2,500 budget to replace two single garage doors; what materials should I be looking at?
Why does my garage door start to close and then immediately reverse back up even if nothing is in the way?
How can I tell if a garage door is actually insulated or if it's just a thin piece of metal?
How often should I be getting my garage door serviced to prevent the cables from snapping?
Is it better to repair a 15-year-old wooden garage door or just replace the whole system with steel?
My garage door remote isn't working but the wall button is, do I need a whole new motor or just a sensor fix?
The bottom seal on my garage door is letting in rain and pests, can a company fix just the seal or do I need a new door?

Model by model

23-point average divergence: which AI you ask changes the answer.

The divergence index is the average gap between the most and least likely model per behavior. Higher = the models disagree more about garage door company buyers.

Behavior rates across 15 garage door company buyer questions, 2026-07 edition. Last column: average across models.
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiConsensus
Recommends hiring a professional80%80%27%40%
Suggests DIY first27%40%20%80%
Names specific providers13%0%7%80%
Gives price or cost info40%40%47%40%
Tells to check reviews7%27%0%73%
Tells to verify credentials13%7%0%87%
Mentions case studies / portfolio0%0%0%100%
Mentions local proximity27%33%13%67%
Gives selection criteria47%47%40%60%
Warns about red flags13%20%20%93%
Asks a clarifying question73%67%7%0%
Recommends multiple quotes27%27%0%60%

By model

How each assistant handled Garage Door Company questions.

Reading the 45 answers model by model shows how differently the three assistants treat the same garage door company questions. On the most consequential behavior — whether to send the buyer to a professional at all — the rate ranged from 80% (ChatGPT) down to 26.7% (Gemini), a 53-point gap on an identical question set.

Across the 15 garage door company answers it produced, ChatGPT recommended hiring a professional in 80% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 26.7% of the time. It named a specific provider in 13.3% of answers (about 0.3 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 40% of the time. ChatGPT asked a clarifying question before answering in 73.3% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 13.3%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 13.3%, averaging 457 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 6.7%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 0%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 26.7%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 46.7% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 26.7%.

Across the 15 garage door company answers it produced, Claude recommended hiring a professional in 80% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 40% of the time. It named a specific provider in 0% of answers (about 0 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 40% of the time. Claude asked a clarifying question before answering in 66.7% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 20%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 6.7%, averaging 289 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 26.7%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 0%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 33.3%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 46.7% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 26.7%.

Across the 15 garage door company answers it produced, Gemini recommended hiring a professional in 26.7% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 20% of the time. It named a specific provider in 6.7% of answers (about 0.1 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 46.7% of the time. Gemini asked a clarifying question before answering in 6.7% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 20%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 0%, averaging 278 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 0%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 0%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 13.3%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 40% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 0%.

Taken together, ChatGPT is the assistant most likely to route a garage door company buyer to a professional (80%) and Gemini the least (26.7%). ChatGPT produced the longest answers, at 457 words on average. Specific providers were named most often by ChatGPT (13.3%) — even there, roughly one answer in 8 carried a name.

Where they disagree

The behaviors where the choice of model changes the answer.

The divergence index for this study is 23.3 points — the average distance between the most and least likely model across the coded behaviors. The gaps below are where which assistant a garage door company buyer happens to ask matters most:

  • Asks a clarifying question: from 6.7% (Gemini) to 73.3% (ChatGPT) — a 67-point spread.
  • Recommends hiring a professional: from 26.7% (Gemini) to 80% (ChatGPT) — a 53-point spread.
  • Tells the buyer to check reviews: from 0% (Gemini) to 26.7% (Claude) — a 27-point spread.
  • Recommends multiple quotes: from 0% (Gemini) to 26.7% (ChatGPT) — a 27-point spread.
  • Suggests a DIY approach first: from 20% (Gemini) to 40% (Claude) — a 20-point spread.

The widest single gap — asks a clarifying question, 67 points — means a garage door company buyer can receive materially different guidance on the same question depending only on which assistant they happen to open, so any visibility strategy built on a single model's behavior describes only part of the garage door company market.

Where they agree

The points of near-consensus in Garage Door Company.

On other behaviors the three models move almost in lockstep — the points of near-consensus for garage door company, where all three landed within a few points of each other:

  • Mentions case studies or portfolio: 0% across all three models.
  • Gives price or cost information: 40%–46.7% across all three (a 7-point spread).
  • Gives selection criteria: 40%–46.7% across all three (a 7-point spread).
  • Warns about red flags or scams: 13.3%–20% across all three (a 7-point spread).

Measured question by question, the three assistants coded a response the same way most consistently on "mentions case studies or portfolio" (identical coding in 100% of questions) and least consistently on "asks a clarifying question" (0%).

Every behavior, measured

All twelve coded behaviors for Garage Door Company, averaged across the three models.

The behaviors AI models reproduce most often for garage door company are recommends hiring a professional (62.2% on average), asks a clarifying question (48.9%) and gives selection criteria (44.5%); the rarest are mentions case studies or portfolio (0%), tells the buyer to verify credentials (6.7%) and names a specific provider (6.7%). Each figure below is the share of a model's 15 answers in which the behavior appeared at least once, averaged across the 3 models with the full per-model range in parentheses:

  • Recommends hiring a professional: 62.2% on average (ChatGPT 80%, Claude 80%, Gemini 26.7%) — a 53-point spread.
  • Asks a clarifying question: 48.9% on average (ChatGPT 73.3%, Claude 66.7%, Gemini 6.7%) — a 67-point spread.
  • Gives selection criteria: 44.5% on average (ChatGPT 46.7%, Claude 46.7%, Gemini 40%) — a 7-point spread.
  • Gives price or cost information: 42.2% on average (ChatGPT 40%, Claude 40%, Gemini 46.7%) — a 7-point spread.
  • Suggests a DIY approach first: 28.9% on average (ChatGPT 26.7%, Claude 40%, Gemini 20%) — a 20-point spread.
  • Mentions local proximity: 24.4% on average (ChatGPT 26.7%, Claude 33.3%, Gemini 13.3%) — a 20-point spread.
  • Warns about red flags or scams: 17.8% on average (ChatGPT 13.3%, Claude 20%, Gemini 20%) — a 7-point spread.
  • Recommends multiple quotes: 17.8% on average (ChatGPT 26.7%, Claude 26.7%, Gemini 0%) — a 27-point spread.
  • Tells the buyer to check reviews: 11.1% on average (ChatGPT 6.7%, Claude 26.7%, Gemini 0%) — a 27-point spread.
  • Names a specific provider: 6.7% on average (ChatGPT 13.3%, Claude 0%, Gemini 6.7%) — a 13-point spread.
  • Tells the buyer to verify credentials: 6.7% on average (ChatGPT 13.3%, Claude 6.7%, Gemini 0%) — a 13-point spread.
  • Mentions case studies or portfolio: 0% on average (ChatGPT 0%, Claude 0%, Gemini 0%).

Trust signals

How well the models protect the garage door company buyer.

Beyond whether to hire, the rubric codes how carefully each assistant protects the garage door company buyer once a decision is made. Telling the buyer to check reviews or ratings appeared in 11.1% of answers on average. Verifying credentials or certifications appeared in 6.7%. Warning about red flags or scams appeared in 17.8%.

On structuring the decision, a selection-criteria checklist showed up in 44.5% of answers on average and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 17.8%. The single least-reproduced protective signal for garage door company is "tells the buyer to verify credentials" at 6.7% on average — the clearest opening for content that supplies it, since the models are not yet reliably surfacing that guidance on their own.

Referral behavior

Do AI models name Garage Door Company providers?

For service providers the decisive question is whether these systems name anyone at all. Across 45 garage door company answers, a specific provider was named in 6.7% of responses on average — roughly 0.1 distinct providers per answer. In practice the assistants behave far more as an explanatory layer than as a referral engine for garage door company: visibility comes from being the reasoning a model reproduces, not from being the named recommendation.

The question set

What these 15 Garage Door Company questions cover.

The 15 questions behind every percentage on this page were drawn from real garage door company (home services; buyer hiring decisions for this specific service) buyer journeys. Each was put to all 3 models once, with identical wording, so the rates above describe how the assistants handled this exact garage door company question set — not a general prior or a hand-picked subset. The full list is shown earlier on this page; the coded percentages are what those specific questions produced.

How to read this

A note on the numbers.

A percentage here is the share of a model's 15 answers in which the behavior appeared at least once — not a confidence score. Because each model answered every question exactly once on 2026-07-04, the figures describe this specific garage door company question set and snapshot rather than a general prior. The full protocol and coding rubric are documented in the study methodology.

Methodology

A controlled snapshot, documented end to end.

15 standardized buyer questions per industry, one response per model per question (ChatGPT (gpt-5-mini), Claude (claude-sonnet-5), Gemini (gemini-3-flash-preview)), collected 2026-07-04, coded against a fixed 12-behavior rubric with human QA. AI outputs vary with model version, location and time — figures describe this sample and window, and are refreshed each edition. Read the full methodology →