AI SEO Statistics: Google Maps SEO for Glass Companies (2026-07 edition)

Reading the 120 answers model by model shows how differently the three assistants treat the same google maps seo for glass companies questions. On the most consequential behavior — whether to send the buyer to a professional at all — the rate ranged from 30% (ChatGPT) down to 12.5% (Gemini), a 18-point gap on an identical question set.

Across the 40 google maps seo for glass companies answers it produced, ChatGPT recommended hiring a professional in 30% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 50% of the time. It named a specific provider in 10% of answers (about 0.3 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 10% of the time. ChatGPT asked a clarifying question before answering in 22.5% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 0%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 0%, averaging 657 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 2.5%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 5%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 27.5%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 10% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 2.5%.

Across the 40 google maps seo for glass companies answers it produced, Claude recommended hiring a professional in 20% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 40% of the time. It named a specific provider in 12.5% of answers (about 0.6 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 10% of the time. Claude asked a clarifying question before answering in 70% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 20%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 0%, averaging 319 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 5%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 10%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 52.5%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 20% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 2.5%.

Across the 40 google maps seo for glass companies answers it produced, Gemini recommended hiring a professional in 12.5% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 40% of the time. It named a specific provider in 15% of answers (about 0.4 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 7.5% of the time. Gemini asked a clarifying question before answering in 0% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 10%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 0%, averaging 246 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 0%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 7.5%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 35%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 7.5% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 0%.

Taken together, ChatGPT is the assistant most likely to route a google maps seo for glass companies buyer to a professional (30%) and Gemini the least (12.5%). ChatGPT produced the longest answers, at 657 words on average. Specific providers were named most often by Gemini (15%) — even there, roughly one answer in 7 carried a name.

On other behaviors the three models move almost in lockstep — the points of near-consensus for google maps seo for glass companies, where all three landed within a few points of each other:

• Tells the buyer to verify credentials: 0% across all three models.
• Gives price or cost information: 7.5%–10% across all three (a 3-point spread).
• Recommends multiple quotes: 0%–2.5% across all three (a 3-point spread).
• Names a specific provider: 10%–15% across all three (a 5-point spread).

Measured question by question, the three assistants coded a response the same way most consistently on "tells the buyer to verify credentials" (identical coding in 100% of questions) and least consistently on "asks a clarifying question" (30%).

Beyond whether to hire, the rubric codes how carefully each assistant protects the google maps seo for glass companies buyer once a decision is made. Telling the buyer to check reviews or ratings appeared in 2.5% of answers on average. Verifying credentials or certifications appeared in 0%. Warning about red flags or scams appeared in 10%.

On structuring the decision, a selection-criteria checklist showed up in 12.5% of answers on average and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 1.7%. The single least-reproduced protective signal for google maps seo for glass companies is "tells the buyer to verify credentials" at 0% on average — the clearest opening for content that supplies it, since the models are not yet reliably surfacing that guidance on their own.

The 40 questions behind every percentage on this page were drawn from real google maps seo for glass companies (home services; buyer hiring decisions for this specific service) buyer journeys. Each was put to all 3 models once, with identical wording, so the rates above describe how the assistants handled this exact google maps seo for glass companies question set — not a general prior or a hand-picked subset. The full list is shown earlier on this page; the coded percentages are what those specific questions produced.