AI SEO Statistics: Hoa Management (2026-07 edition)
40 questions · 120 AI responses · 3 models · measured 2026-07-06
The question bank
The questions we tested — sampled from real buyer journeys in hoa management.
Each model answered every question once, same wording, same day. These are the prompts behind every percentage on this page.
Show all 40 questions
Model by model
22-point average divergence: which AI you ask changes the answer.
The divergence index is the average gap between the most and least likely model per behavior. Higher = the models disagree more about hoa management buyers.
| ChatGPT | Claude | Gemini | Consensus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommends hiring a professional | 75% | 50% | 30% | 50% |
| Suggests DIY first | 23% | 13% | 10% | 80% |
| Names specific providers | 3% | 8% | 10% | 85% |
| Gives price or cost info | 10% | 15% | 18% | 90% |
| Tells to check reviews | 15% | 8% | 3% | 80% |
| Tells to verify credentials | 30% | 8% | 13% | 63% |
| Mentions case studies / portfolio | 18% | 3% | 0% | 83% |
| Mentions local proximity | 25% | 30% | 10% | 58% |
| Gives selection criteria | 48% | 45% | 23% | 43% |
| Warns about red flags | 25% | 18% | 8% | 78% |
| Asks a clarifying question | 48% | 63% | 0% | 23% |
| Recommends multiple quotes | 25% | 15% | 5% | 70% |
By model
How each assistant handled Hoa Management questions.
Reading the 120 answers model by model shows how differently the three assistants treat the same hoa management questions. On the most consequential behavior — whether to send the buyer to a professional at all — the rate ranged from 75% (ChatGPT) down to 30% (Gemini), a 45-point gap on an identical question set.
Across the 40 hoa management answers it produced, ChatGPT recommended hiring a professional in 75% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 22.5% of the time. It named a specific provider in 2.5% of answers (about 0.1 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 10% of the time. ChatGPT asked a clarifying question before answering in 47.5% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 25%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 30%, averaging 634 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 15%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 17.5%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 25%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 47.5% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 25%.
Across the 40 hoa management answers it produced, Claude recommended hiring a professional in 50% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 12.5% of the time. It named a specific provider in 7.5% of answers (about 0.4 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 15% of the time. Claude asked a clarifying question before answering in 62.5% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 17.5%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 7.5%, averaging 309 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 7.5%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 2.5%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 30%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 45% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 15%.
Across the 40 hoa management answers it produced, Gemini recommended hiring a professional in 30% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 10% of the time. It named a specific provider in 10% of answers (about 0.3 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 17.5% of the time. Gemini asked a clarifying question before answering in 0% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 7.5%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 12.5%, averaging 265 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 2.5%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 0%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 10%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 22.5% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 5%.
Taken together, ChatGPT is the assistant most likely to route a hoa management buyer to a professional (75%) and Gemini the least (30%). ChatGPT produced the longest answers, at 634 words on average. Specific providers were named most often by Gemini (10%) — even there, roughly one answer in 10 carried a name.
Where they disagree
The behaviors where the choice of model changes the answer.
The divergence index for this study is 22.2 points — the average distance between the most and least likely model across the coded behaviors. The gaps below are where which assistant a hoa management buyer happens to ask matters most:
- Asks a clarifying question: from 0% (Gemini) to 62.5% (Claude) — a 63-point spread.
- Recommends hiring a professional: from 30% (Gemini) to 75% (ChatGPT) — a 45-point spread.
- Gives selection criteria: from 22.5% (Gemini) to 47.5% (ChatGPT) — a 25-point spread.
- Tells the buyer to verify credentials: from 7.5% (Claude) to 30% (ChatGPT) — a 23-point spread.
- Mentions local proximity: from 10% (Gemini) to 30% (Claude) — a 20-point spread.
The widest single gap — asks a clarifying question, 63 points — means a hoa management buyer can receive materially different guidance on the same question depending only on which assistant they happen to open, so any visibility strategy built on a single model's behavior describes only part of the hoa management market.
Where they agree
The points of near-consensus in Hoa Management.
On other behaviors the three models move almost in lockstep — the points of near-consensus for hoa management, where all three landed within a few points of each other:
- Names a specific provider: 2.5%–10% across all three (a 8-point spread).
- Gives price or cost information: 10%–17.5% across all three (a 8-point spread).
- Suggests a DIY approach first: 10%–22.5% across all three (a 13-point spread).
- Tells the buyer to check reviews: 2.5%–15% across all three (a 13-point spread).
Measured question by question, the three assistants coded a response the same way most consistently on "gives price or cost information" (identical coding in 90% of questions) and least consistently on "asks a clarifying question" (22.5%).
Every behavior, measured
All twelve coded behaviors for Hoa Management, averaged across the three models.
The behaviors AI models reproduce most often for hoa management are recommends hiring a professional (51.7% on average), gives selection criteria (38.3%) and asks a clarifying question (36.7%); the rarest are mentions case studies or portfolio (6.7%), names a specific provider (6.7%) and tells the buyer to check reviews (8.3%). Each figure below is the share of a model's 40 answers in which the behavior appeared at least once, averaged across the 3 models with the full per-model range in parentheses:
- Recommends hiring a professional: 51.7% on average (ChatGPT 75%, Claude 50%, Gemini 30%) — a 45-point spread.
- Gives selection criteria: 38.3% on average (ChatGPT 47.5%, Claude 45%, Gemini 22.5%) — a 25-point spread.
- Asks a clarifying question: 36.7% on average (ChatGPT 47.5%, Claude 62.5%, Gemini 0%) — a 63-point spread.
- Mentions local proximity: 21.7% on average (ChatGPT 25%, Claude 30%, Gemini 10%) — a 20-point spread.
- Tells the buyer to verify credentials: 16.7% on average (ChatGPT 30%, Claude 7.5%, Gemini 12.5%) — a 23-point spread.
- Warns about red flags or scams: 16.7% on average (ChatGPT 25%, Claude 17.5%, Gemini 7.5%) — a 18-point spread.
- Suggests a DIY approach first: 15% on average (ChatGPT 22.5%, Claude 12.5%, Gemini 10%) — a 13-point spread.
- Recommends multiple quotes: 15% on average (ChatGPT 25%, Claude 15%, Gemini 5%) — a 20-point spread.
- Gives price or cost information: 14.2% on average (ChatGPT 10%, Claude 15%, Gemini 17.5%) — a 8-point spread.
- Tells the buyer to check reviews: 8.3% on average (ChatGPT 15%, Claude 7.5%, Gemini 2.5%) — a 13-point spread.
- Names a specific provider: 6.7% on average (ChatGPT 2.5%, Claude 7.5%, Gemini 10%) — a 8-point spread.
- Mentions case studies or portfolio: 6.7% on average (ChatGPT 17.5%, Claude 2.5%, Gemini 0%) — a 18-point spread.
Trust signals
How well the models protect the hoa management buyer.
Beyond whether to hire, the rubric codes how carefully each assistant protects the hoa management buyer once a decision is made. Telling the buyer to check reviews or ratings appeared in 8.3% of answers on average. Verifying credentials or certifications appeared in 16.7%. Warning about red flags or scams appeared in 16.7%.
On structuring the decision, a selection-criteria checklist showed up in 38.3% of answers on average and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 15%. The single least-reproduced protective signal for hoa management is "tells the buyer to check reviews" at 8.3% on average — the clearest opening for content that supplies it, since the models are not yet reliably surfacing that guidance on their own.
Referral behavior
Do AI models name Hoa Management providers?
For service providers the decisive question is whether these systems name anyone at all. Across 120 hoa management answers, a specific provider was named in 6.7% of responses on average — roughly 0.3 distinct providers per answer. In practice the assistants behave far more as an explanatory layer than as a referral engine for hoa management: visibility comes from being the reasoning a model reproduces, not from being the named recommendation.
The question set
What these 40 Hoa Management questions cover.
The 40 questions behind every percentage on this page were drawn from real hoa management (home services; buyer hiring decisions for this specific service) buyer journeys. Each was put to all 3 models once, with identical wording, so the rates above describe how the assistants handled this exact hoa management question set — not a general prior or a hand-picked subset. The full list is shown earlier on this page; the coded percentages are what those specific questions produced.
How to read this
A note on the numbers.
A percentage here is the share of a model's 40 answers in which the behavior appeared at least once — not a confidence score. Because each model answered every question exactly once on 2026-07-06, the figures describe this specific hoa management question set and snapshot rather than a general prior. The full protocol and coding rubric are documented in the study methodology.
Methodology
A controlled snapshot, documented end to end.
40 standardized buyer questions per industry, one response per model per question (ChatGPT (gpt-5-mini), Claude (claude-sonnet-5), Gemini (gemini-3-flash-preview)), collected 2026-07-06, coded against a fixed 12-behavior rubric with human QA. AI outputs vary with model version, location and time — figures describe this sample and window, and are refreshed each edition. Read the full methodology →