AI SEO Statistics: Consultant (2026-07 edition)

Reading the 45 answers model by model shows how differently the three assistants treat the same consultant questions. On the most consequential behavior — whether to send the buyer to a professional at all — the rate ranged from 66.7% (ChatGPT) down to 53.3% (Claude), a 13-point gap on an identical question set.

Across the 15 consultant answers it produced, ChatGPT recommended hiring a professional in 66.7% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 6.7% of the time. It named a specific provider in 0% of answers (about 0 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 20% of the time. ChatGPT asked a clarifying question before answering in 73.3% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 13.3%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 20%, averaging 706 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 20%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 46.7%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 13.3%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 53.3% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 0%.

Across the 15 consultant answers it produced, Claude recommended hiring a professional in 53.3% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 13.3% of the time. It named a specific provider in 6.7% of answers (about 0.3 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 0% of the time. Claude asked a clarifying question before answering in 66.7% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 20%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 0%, averaging 328 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 0%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 13.3%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 13.3%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 46.7% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 0%.

Across the 15 consultant answers it produced, Gemini recommended hiring a professional in 53.3% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 6.7% of the time. It named a specific provider in 20% of answers (about 0.6 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 26.7% of the time. Gemini asked a clarifying question before answering in 0% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 6.7%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 0%, averaging 280 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 0%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 0%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 0%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 33.3% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 0%.

Taken together, ChatGPT is the assistant most likely to route a consultant buyer to a professional (66.7%) and Claude the least (53.3%). ChatGPT produced the longest answers, at 706 words on average. Specific providers were named most often by Gemini (20%) — even there, roughly one answer in 5 carried a name.

On other behaviors the three models move almost in lockstep — the points of near-consensus for consultant, where all three landed within a few points of each other:

• Recommends multiple quotes: 0% across all three models.
• Suggests a DIY approach first: 6.7%–13.3% across all three (a 7-point spread).
• Mentions local proximity: 0%–13.3% across all three (a 13-point spread).
• Warns about red flags or scams: 6.7%–20% across all three (a 13-point spread).

Measured question by question, the three assistants coded a response the same way most consistently on "recommends multiple quotes" (identical coding in 100% of questions) and least consistently on "asks a clarifying question" (13.3%).

Beyond whether to hire, the rubric codes how carefully each assistant protects the consultant buyer once a decision is made. Telling the buyer to check reviews or ratings appeared in 6.7% of answers on average. Verifying credentials or certifications appeared in 6.7%. Warning about red flags or scams appeared in 13.3%.

On structuring the decision, a selection-criteria checklist showed up in 44.4% of answers on average and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 0%. The single least-reproduced protective signal for consultant is "recommends multiple quotes" at 0% on average — the clearest opening for content that supplies it, since the models are not yet reliably surfacing that guidance on their own.

The 15 questions behind every percentage on this page were drawn from real consultant (professional services; buyer hiring decisions for this specific service) buyer journeys. Each was put to all 3 models once, with identical wording, so the rates above describe how the assistants handled this exact consultant question set — not a general prior or a hand-picked subset. The full list is shown earlier on this page; the coded percentages are what those specific questions produced.