AI SEO Statistics: Dog Trainers (2026-07 edition)
40 questions · 120 AI responses · 3 models · measured 2026-07-06
The question bank
The questions we tested — sampled from real buyer journeys in dog trainers.
Each model answered every question once, same wording, same day. These are the prompts behind every percentage on this page.
Show all 40 questions
Model by model
23-point average divergence: which AI you ask changes the answer.
The divergence index is the average gap between the most and least likely model per behavior. Higher = the models disagree more about dog trainers buyers.
| ChatGPT | Claude | Gemini | Consensus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommends hiring a professional | 90% | 70% | 55% | 50% |
| Suggests DIY first | 35% | 23% | 15% | 75% |
| Names specific providers | 5% | 5% | 18% | 85% |
| Gives price or cost info | 13% | 8% | 15% | 83% |
| Tells to check reviews | 18% | 15% | 0% | 73% |
| Tells to verify credentials | 53% | 25% | 25% | 58% |
| Mentions case studies / portfolio | 23% | 3% | 0% | 78% |
| Mentions local proximity | 30% | 23% | 8% | 68% |
| Gives selection criteria | 55% | 40% | 33% | 48% |
| Warns about red flags | 23% | 20% | 23% | 65% |
| Asks a clarifying question | 73% | 60% | 5% | 25% |
| Recommends multiple quotes | 13% | 3% | 0% | 85% |
By model
How each assistant handled Dog Trainers questions.
Reading the 120 answers model by model shows how differently the three assistants treat the same dog trainers questions. On the most consequential behavior — whether to send the buyer to a professional at all — the rate ranged from 90% (ChatGPT) down to 55% (Gemini), a 35-point gap on an identical question set.
Across the 40 dog trainers answers it produced, ChatGPT recommended hiring a professional in 90% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 35% of the time. It named a specific provider in 5% of answers (about 0.1 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 12.5% of the time. ChatGPT asked a clarifying question before answering in 72.5% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 22.5%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 52.5%, averaging 534 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 17.5%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 22.5%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 30%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 55% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 12.5%.
Across the 40 dog trainers answers it produced, Claude recommended hiring a professional in 70% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 22.5% of the time. It named a specific provider in 5% of answers (about 0.3 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 7.5% of the time. Claude asked a clarifying question before answering in 60% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 20%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 25%, averaging 285 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 15%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 2.5%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 22.5%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 40% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 2.5%.
Across the 40 dog trainers answers it produced, Gemini recommended hiring a professional in 55% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 15% of the time. It named a specific provider in 17.5% of answers (about 0.5 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 15% of the time. Gemini asked a clarifying question before answering in 5% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 22.5%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 25%, averaging 275 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 0%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 0%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 7.5%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 32.5% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 0%.
Taken together, ChatGPT is the assistant most likely to route a dog trainers buyer to a professional (90%) and Gemini the least (55%). ChatGPT produced the longest answers, at 534 words on average. Specific providers were named most often by Gemini (17.5%) — even there, roughly one answer in 6 carried a name.
Where they disagree
The behaviors where the choice of model changes the answer.
The divergence index for this study is 22.8 points — the average distance between the most and least likely model across the coded behaviors. The gaps below are where which assistant a dog trainers buyer happens to ask matters most:
- Asks a clarifying question: from 5% (Gemini) to 72.5% (ChatGPT) — a 68-point spread.
- Recommends hiring a professional: from 55% (Gemini) to 90% (ChatGPT) — a 35-point spread.
- Tells the buyer to verify credentials: from 25% (Claude) to 52.5% (ChatGPT) — a 28-point spread.
- Mentions case studies or portfolio: from 0% (Gemini) to 22.5% (ChatGPT) — a 23-point spread.
- Mentions local proximity: from 7.5% (Gemini) to 30% (ChatGPT) — a 23-point spread.
The widest single gap — asks a clarifying question, 68 points — means a dog trainers buyer can receive materially different guidance on the same question depending only on which assistant they happen to open, so any visibility strategy built on a single model's behavior describes only part of the dog trainers market.
Where they agree
The points of near-consensus in Dog Trainers.
On other behaviors the three models move almost in lockstep — the points of near-consensus for dog trainers, where all three landed within a few points of each other:
- Warns about red flags or scams: 20%–22.5% across all three (a 3-point spread).
- Gives price or cost information: 7.5%–15% across all three (a 8-point spread).
- Names a specific provider: 5%–17.5% across all three (a 13-point spread).
- Recommends multiple quotes: 0%–12.5% across all three (a 13-point spread).
Measured question by question, the three assistants coded a response the same way most consistently on "names a specific provider" (identical coding in 85% of questions) and least consistently on "asks a clarifying question" (25%).
Every behavior, measured
All twelve coded behaviors for Dog Trainers, averaged across the three models.
The behaviors AI models reproduce most often for dog trainers are recommends hiring a professional (71.7% on average), asks a clarifying question (45.8%) and gives selection criteria (42.5%); the rarest are recommends multiple quotes (5%), mentions case studies or portfolio (8.3%) and names a specific provider (9.2%). Each figure below is the share of a model's 40 answers in which the behavior appeared at least once, averaged across the 3 models with the full per-model range in parentheses:
- Recommends hiring a professional: 71.7% on average (ChatGPT 90%, Claude 70%, Gemini 55%) — a 35-point spread.
- Asks a clarifying question: 45.8% on average (ChatGPT 72.5%, Claude 60%, Gemini 5%) — a 68-point spread.
- Gives selection criteria: 42.5% on average (ChatGPT 55%, Claude 40%, Gemini 32.5%) — a 23-point spread.
- Tells the buyer to verify credentials: 34.2% on average (ChatGPT 52.5%, Claude 25%, Gemini 25%) — a 28-point spread.
- Suggests a DIY approach first: 24.2% on average (ChatGPT 35%, Claude 22.5%, Gemini 15%) — a 20-point spread.
- Warns about red flags or scams: 21.7% on average (ChatGPT 22.5%, Claude 20%, Gemini 22.5%) — a 3-point spread.
- Mentions local proximity: 20% on average (ChatGPT 30%, Claude 22.5%, Gemini 7.5%) — a 23-point spread.
- Gives price or cost information: 11.7% on average (ChatGPT 12.5%, Claude 7.5%, Gemini 15%) — a 8-point spread.
- Tells the buyer to check reviews: 10.8% on average (ChatGPT 17.5%, Claude 15%, Gemini 0%) — a 18-point spread.
- Names a specific provider: 9.2% on average (ChatGPT 5%, Claude 5%, Gemini 17.5%) — a 13-point spread.
- Mentions case studies or portfolio: 8.3% on average (ChatGPT 22.5%, Claude 2.5%, Gemini 0%) — a 23-point spread.
- Recommends multiple quotes: 5% on average (ChatGPT 12.5%, Claude 2.5%, Gemini 0%) — a 13-point spread.
Trust signals
How well the models protect the dog trainers buyer.
Beyond whether to hire, the rubric codes how carefully each assistant protects the dog trainers buyer once a decision is made. Telling the buyer to check reviews or ratings appeared in 10.8% of answers on average. Verifying credentials or certifications appeared in 34.2%. Warning about red flags or scams appeared in 21.7%.
On structuring the decision, a selection-criteria checklist showed up in 42.5% of answers on average and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 5%. The single least-reproduced protective signal for dog trainers is "recommends multiple quotes" at 5% on average — the clearest opening for content that supplies it, since the models are not yet reliably surfacing that guidance on their own.
Referral behavior
Do AI models name Dog Trainers providers?
For service providers the decisive question is whether these systems name anyone at all. Across 120 dog trainers answers, a specific provider was named in 9.2% of responses on average — roughly 0.3 distinct providers per answer. In practice the assistants behave far more as an explanatory layer than as a referral engine for dog trainers: visibility comes from being the reasoning a model reproduces, not from being the named recommendation.
The question set
What these 40 Dog Trainers questions cover.
The 40 questions behind every percentage on this page were drawn from real dog trainers (professional services; buyer hiring decisions for this specific service) buyer journeys. Each was put to all 3 models once, with identical wording, so the rates above describe how the assistants handled this exact dog trainers question set — not a general prior or a hand-picked subset. The full list is shown earlier on this page; the coded percentages are what those specific questions produced.
How to read this
A note on the numbers.
A percentage here is the share of a model's 40 answers in which the behavior appeared at least once — not a confidence score. Because each model answered every question exactly once on 2026-07-06, the figures describe this specific dog trainers question set and snapshot rather than a general prior. The full protocol and coding rubric are documented in the study methodology.
Methodology
A controlled snapshot, documented end to end.
40 standardized buyer questions per industry, one response per model per question (ChatGPT (gpt-5-mini), Claude (claude-sonnet-5), Gemini (gemini-3-flash-preview)), collected 2026-07-06, coded against a fixed 12-behavior rubric with human QA. AI outputs vary with model version, location and time — figures describe this sample and window, and are refreshed each edition. Read the full methodology →