AI SEO Statistics: Logistics Companies (2026-07 edition)
40 questions · 120 AI responses · 3 models · measured 2026-07-06
The question bank
The questions we tested — sampled from real buyer journeys in logistics companies.
Each model answered every question once, same wording, same day. These are the prompts behind every percentage on this page.
Show all 40 questions
Model by model
21-point average divergence: which AI you ask changes the answer.
The divergence index is the average gap between the most and least likely model per behavior. Higher = the models disagree more about logistics companies buyers.
| ChatGPT | Claude | Gemini | Consensus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommends hiring a professional | 63% | 50% | 30% | 60% |
| Suggests DIY first | 35% | 30% | 10% | 68% |
| Names specific providers | 15% | 28% | 30% | 58% |
| Gives price or cost info | 13% | 18% | 23% | 80% |
| Tells to check reviews | 13% | 0% | 3% | 85% |
| Tells to verify credentials | 23% | 18% | 8% | 78% |
| Mentions case studies / portfolio | 8% | 3% | 0% | 90% |
| Mentions local proximity | 15% | 10% | 13% | 78% |
| Gives selection criteria | 38% | 45% | 38% | 58% |
| Warns about red flags | 10% | 10% | 8% | 75% |
| Asks a clarifying question | 38% | 53% | 0% | 33% |
| Recommends multiple quotes | 20% | 18% | 0% | 68% |
By model
How each assistant handled Logistics Companies questions.
Reading the 120 answers model by model shows how differently the three assistants treat the same logistics companies questions. On the most consequential behavior — whether to send the buyer to a professional at all — the rate ranged from 62.5% (ChatGPT) down to 30% (Gemini), a 33-point gap on an identical question set.
Across the 40 logistics companies answers it produced, ChatGPT recommended hiring a professional in 62.5% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 35% of the time. It named a specific provider in 15% of answers (about 0.7 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 12.5% of the time. ChatGPT asked a clarifying question before answering in 37.5% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 10%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 22.5%, averaging 653 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 12.5%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 7.5%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 15%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 37.5% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 20%.
Across the 40 logistics companies answers it produced, Claude recommended hiring a professional in 50% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 30% of the time. It named a specific provider in 27.5% of answers (about 1.3 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 17.5% of the time. Claude asked a clarifying question before answering in 52.5% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 10%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 17.5%, averaging 315 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 0%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 2.5%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 10%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 45% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 17.5%.
Across the 40 logistics companies answers it produced, Gemini recommended hiring a professional in 30% of them and suggested a DIY approach first 10% of the time. It named a specific provider in 30% of answers (about 1.2 distinct providers per answer) and included price or cost information 22.5% of the time. Gemini asked a clarifying question before answering in 0% of cases, warned about red flags or scams in 7.5%, and told the buyer to verify credentials in 7.5%, averaging 250 words per answer. On the remaining cues it told the buyer to check reviews in 2.5%, pointed to case studies or a portfolio in 0%, and framed the choice around local proximity in 12.5%; a selection-criteria checklist appeared in 37.5% of its answers and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 0%.
Taken together, ChatGPT is the assistant most likely to route a logistics companies buyer to a professional (62.5%) and Gemini the least (30%). ChatGPT produced the longest answers, at 653 words on average. Specific providers were named most often by Gemini (30%) — even there, roughly one answer in 3 carried a name.
Where they disagree
The behaviors where the choice of model changes the answer.
The divergence index for this study is 20.7 points — the average distance between the most and least likely model across the coded behaviors. The gaps below are where which assistant a logistics companies buyer happens to ask matters most:
- Asks a clarifying question: from 0% (Gemini) to 52.5% (Claude) — a 53-point spread.
- Recommends hiring a professional: from 30% (Gemini) to 62.5% (ChatGPT) — a 33-point spread.
- Suggests a DIY approach first: from 10% (Gemini) to 35% (ChatGPT) — a 25-point spread.
- Recommends multiple quotes: from 0% (Gemini) to 20% (ChatGPT) — a 20-point spread.
- Names a specific provider: from 15% (ChatGPT) to 30% (Gemini) — a 15-point spread.
The widest single gap — asks a clarifying question, 53 points — means a logistics companies buyer can receive materially different guidance on the same question depending only on which assistant they happen to open, so any visibility strategy built on a single model's behavior describes only part of the logistics companies market.
Where they agree
The points of near-consensus in Logistics Companies.
On other behaviors the three models move almost in lockstep — the points of near-consensus for logistics companies, where all three landed within a few points of each other:
- Warns about red flags or scams: 7.5%–10% across all three (a 3-point spread).
- Mentions local proximity: 10%–15% across all three (a 5-point spread).
- Mentions case studies or portfolio: 0%–7.5% across all three (a 8-point spread).
- Gives selection criteria: 37.5%–45% across all three (a 8-point spread).
Measured question by question, the three assistants coded a response the same way most consistently on "mentions case studies or portfolio" (identical coding in 90% of questions) and least consistently on "asks a clarifying question" (32.5%).
Every behavior, measured
All twelve coded behaviors for Logistics Companies, averaged across the three models.
The behaviors AI models reproduce most often for logistics companies are recommends hiring a professional (47.5% on average), gives selection criteria (40%) and asks a clarifying question (30%); the rarest are mentions case studies or portfolio (3.3%), tells the buyer to check reviews (5%) and warns about red flags or scams (9.2%). Each figure below is the share of a model's 40 answers in which the behavior appeared at least once, averaged across the 3 models with the full per-model range in parentheses:
- Recommends hiring a professional: 47.5% on average (ChatGPT 62.5%, Claude 50%, Gemini 30%) — a 33-point spread.
- Gives selection criteria: 40% on average (ChatGPT 37.5%, Claude 45%, Gemini 37.5%) — a 8-point spread.
- Asks a clarifying question: 30% on average (ChatGPT 37.5%, Claude 52.5%, Gemini 0%) — a 53-point spread.
- Suggests a DIY approach first: 25% on average (ChatGPT 35%, Claude 30%, Gemini 10%) — a 25-point spread.
- Names a specific provider: 24.2% on average (ChatGPT 15%, Claude 27.5%, Gemini 30%) — a 15-point spread.
- Gives price or cost information: 17.5% on average (ChatGPT 12.5%, Claude 17.5%, Gemini 22.5%) — a 10-point spread.
- Tells the buyer to verify credentials: 15.8% on average (ChatGPT 22.5%, Claude 17.5%, Gemini 7.5%) — a 15-point spread.
- Mentions local proximity: 12.5% on average (ChatGPT 15%, Claude 10%, Gemini 12.5%) — a 5-point spread.
- Recommends multiple quotes: 12.5% on average (ChatGPT 20%, Claude 17.5%, Gemini 0%) — a 20-point spread.
- Warns about red flags or scams: 9.2% on average (ChatGPT 10%, Claude 10%, Gemini 7.5%) — a 3-point spread.
- Tells the buyer to check reviews: 5% on average (ChatGPT 12.5%, Claude 0%, Gemini 2.5%) — a 13-point spread.
- Mentions case studies or portfolio: 3.3% on average (ChatGPT 7.5%, Claude 2.5%, Gemini 0%) — a 8-point spread.
Trust signals
How well the models protect the logistics companies buyer.
Beyond whether to hire, the rubric codes how carefully each assistant protects the logistics companies buyer once a decision is made. Telling the buyer to check reviews or ratings appeared in 5% of answers on average. Verifying credentials or certifications appeared in 15.8%. Warning about red flags or scams appeared in 9.2%.
On structuring the decision, a selection-criteria checklist showed up in 40% of answers on average and a recommendation to gather multiple quotes in 12.5%. The single least-reproduced protective signal for logistics companies is "tells the buyer to check reviews" at 5% on average — the clearest opening for content that supplies it, since the models are not yet reliably surfacing that guidance on their own.
Referral behavior
Do AI models name Logistics Companies providers?
For service providers the decisive question is whether these systems name anyone at all. Across 120 logistics companies answers, a specific provider was named in 24.2% of responses on average — roughly 1.1 distinct providers per answer. In practice the assistants behave far more as an explanatory layer than as a referral engine for logistics companies: visibility comes from being the reasoning a model reproduces, not from being the named recommendation.
The question set
What these 40 Logistics Companies questions cover.
The 40 questions behind every percentage on this page were drawn from real logistics companies (professional services; buyer hiring decisions for this specific service) buyer journeys. Each was put to all 3 models once, with identical wording, so the rates above describe how the assistants handled this exact logistics companies question set — not a general prior or a hand-picked subset. The full list is shown earlier on this page; the coded percentages are what those specific questions produced.
How to read this
A note on the numbers.
A percentage here is the share of a model's 40 answers in which the behavior appeared at least once — not a confidence score. Because each model answered every question exactly once on 2026-07-06, the figures describe this specific logistics companies question set and snapshot rather than a general prior. The full protocol and coding rubric are documented in the study methodology.
Methodology
A controlled snapshot, documented end to end.
40 standardized buyer questions per industry, one response per model per question (ChatGPT (gpt-5-mini), Claude (claude-sonnet-5), Gemini (gemini-3-flash-preview)), collected 2026-07-06, coded against a fixed 12-behavior rubric with human QA. AI outputs vary with model version, location and time — figures describe this sample and window, and are refreshed each edition. Read the full methodology →