Single-page websites have a narrower SEO scope than multi-page sites, which generally means lower costs — but that doesn't mean pricing is simple. Three factors do most of the work in determining what you'll pay.
1. Keyword Competition
This is the dominant variable. A local electrician in a mid-sized city competing for "electrician [city name]" is a very different project from a SaaS company targeting "project management software" nationally. In our experience, competition level affects timeline, content investment, and link-building budget more than any other single factor.
2. Technical Starting Point
Some one-page sites are technically clean — fast, mobile-optimized, structured data in place. Others need significant foundational work before any ranking effort makes sense. Core Web Vitals, crawlability, canonical tags, and schema markup all need to be assessed before a realistic budget can be set. Skipping this step leads to paying for optimization on a broken foundation.
3. What the Page Is Trying to Rank For
A single-page site targeting one local keyword with clear commercial intent is a focused, achievable project. A single-page site expected to rank for five different service categories across a national market is working against its own structure. The more you ask of a one-page format, the more the structure itself becomes the constraint — and no budget solves a structural problem.
Anchor link architecture is a cost element unique to single-page sites. Since all content lives on one URL, how sections are labeled, linked internally via anchor tags, and crawled by Google matters more than on a standard site. Getting this right is a technical task that adds to setup cost but pays off in crawlability and user experience.