Read the evidence note before using any benchmark as a planning reference. The purpose of this section is to distinguish what the research describes, the available evidence categories, and how a box owner can avoid turning a contextual range into a target.
The benchmarks draw on three evidence categories: public keyword research tools, including Google Keyword Planner and third-party products such as Ahrefs and Semrush; fitness-industry reports and consumer survey material; and observed ranges from campaigns managed for fitness and gym clients. Together they form the benchmark set used throughout this page, so each figure can be traced to a type of evidence.
Ranges are used to reflect real variation between markets rather than false precision. That matters when you compare. A result observed for an established affiliate in a less competitive market may not transfer to a newer box facing different competitors, search demand, site history, or local business conditions. That is why the page uses ranges to frame decisions rather than to predict a single outcome.
When deciding whether a benchmark is comparable, check:
- whether the geography and market density resemble your own;
- whether the box is established or newly launched;
- whether the comparison includes similar program offerings and local competitors;
- whether the same conversion event, attribution window, and traffic source definitions are being used;
- whether review data, local profile data, and website analytics cover the same period.
If your own performance differs from a published range, do not assume the difference identifies a specific cause. First confirm the metric definition, the measurement period, and the quality of your tracking. A gap may reflect market conditions, site implementation, offer structure, attribution, or simply a non-comparable benchmark.
This page may be updated as its references change. When you reuse a figure that comes from a third-party report, cite that report as the primary source alongside this page.